REMAKING OF THE NEW STATE IN WATER MANAGEMENT

Authors

  • R Y Gembong Rahmadi Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Gregorius Sahdan Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Mohamad Firdaus Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Utami Sulistiana Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Junior Hendri Wijaya Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • John Monday Etebom Department of Political Science University of Alabama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v5i2.495

Keywords:

Government Making, Shared Resources, Water

Abstract

This study illustrates the dominance of the state through subdistrict governments and the private sector in managing water as a shared resource in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The state's dominance in managing water resources, as a collectively owned resource, results in limited community access to water as a resource that should be enjoyed together. The need for waterfalls in DIY is very large every year, especially when entering the dry season. Girikerto's location at the foot of Mount Merapi means that the area has abundant water resources. However, the local community actually has limited access to water due to the cooperation between the district government and the private sector in dropping water into Gunungkidul Regency. The aim of this research is to illustrate how the state, through sub-district governments, can still provide local communities with access to utilize the water resources they need to meet their daily living needs. The results of this research show that the state, through the village government, has provided access to local communities to enjoy water.

References

Atiandina, D. (2020). Article Review: The Tragedy of the Commons. populicenter.org. https://populicenter.org/2020/06/04/article-review-the-tragedy-of-the-commons/

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. science, 302(5652), 1907-1912.

Lukas, M. (2023). Tantangan Common Dilema Dalam Kelembagaan Pengelolaan Daerah Irigasi Bena. Jurnal Administrasi dan Demokrasi (Administration and Democracy Journal), 2(01), 60-68.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.

Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual review of political science, 2(1), 493-535.

Ostrom, E. (2000). Reformulating the commons. Swiss Political Science Review, 6(1), 29-52.

Ostrom, E. (2008). The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(4), 8-21.

Ovando, D. A., Deacon, R. T., Lester, S. E., Costello, C., Van Leuvan, T., McIlwain, K., Kent Strauss, C., Arbuckle, M., Fujita, R., Gelcich, S., & Uchida, H. (2013). Conservation incentives and collective choices in cooperative fisheries. Marine Policy, 37, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.03.012

Satria, A. (2020). Politik sumber daya alam. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Wade, R. (1987). The Management Of Common Property Resources: Collective Action As An Alternative To Privatisation Or State Regulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11(2), 95-106

Downloads

Submitted

2025-02-07

Accepted

2025-02-07

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Rahmadi, R. Y. G., Sahdan, G., Firdaus, M., Sulistiana, U., Wijaya, J. H., & Etebom, J. M. (2024). REMAKING OF THE NEW STATE IN WATER MANAGEMENT. GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta), 5(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v5i2.495